where we write it

We Exist to Justify Morality

The universe may not give any meaning to us, however we give meaning to the universe by giving meaning to ourselves.  ‘S’

So I believe, the purpose of becoming so aware of existence is to justify morality.

It’s obvious that all humanity sooner or later will go.  A 100 thousands, 200 thousands or a million years optimistically,  it will all go.

That comes in to answer the old question why something instead of nothing.  Well, it’s because if there was nothing , then ‘S’  (i.e.  from our point of view) it would be just as having something but not being able to wonder it,  and  we would’ve not been able to wonder it if there was to be nothing.   Thus there is something that exist for us to realize and wonder.  Finally I conclude that we wonder consciousness to justify good morality because without wondering consciousness, we would live unjust inhumanity,  and that would’ve been possible if we were not to wonder in first place, or not even exist  ‘from our point of view’.

I check this view with the fact that neither dead people nor non-intelligent spices are aware of existence with all its consciousness of good morality  and all its  vices  that destroy fairness and justice…

Key points:

  • The mere fact that one consciously and intellectually recognizes existence gives meaning to their existence and the universe; passively existing does not. 

  •  The first thing conscious wondering is able to control and contribute thoughts into is one’s actions. Thus fairness and good morality become common goals everyone immediately wants and benefits from.  Other purposes are personal and inclusive of getting justice to oneself at least,  thus they cannot be global.     ( For example even Hitler sought the purpose of justice for himself, but also sought evil greed and murders beyond it which were purposes not agreed on by everyone else and in fact rejected since they violated their own just morality purpose in existence.  Therefore,  justifying morality remains common for existing and survival while evil greed and murders cannot be the purpose for humanity.)

Full explanation:

Let me assign that definition the operation ‘ S ‘ : (i.e giving meaning to the universe by giving meaning to ourselves. Or in other words, from our point of view…)

[ For example, if (A) meant that planet Earth is pointless, then (A) * S would mean that planet Earth is valuable because from our point of view it contains us and we are valuable. Thus giving value to planet Earth.]

Taking into consideration:

(ja) – to realize existence   ;   (jb) – Not realize existence

(ja) heart beating flowing blood to an active brain to realize existence:

(jb) could have been dead instead. or otherwise we would not exist at all from the beginning .

(e.g. alive animals but not smart to wonder)

(ka)- To wonder existence   ;    (kb)- Not wonder existence

(ka) to be smart enough to reason and discuss existence and one’s actions and morality

(kb) we remain non intelligent spicies with brains incapable of that

(e.g.  evolution smart enough to wonder)

 

Here :

1  means  Possible

0  means  Impossible

 

Now,  the below table reads as:  Is it possible to  (realize/ not realize) existence in (an existence/ no existence) ?

                                        (ja)                                              (jb)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Realize existence xxxxxxx Not realize existence

Null: no existence             0                       xxxx                    1

I: existence                       ?3                        xxxx                   ?2

fill ?2:

?2 theoretically is 1 or 0, however

?2 * S = 0 , because 1 is equivalent to Null

since we exist,  therefore ?2 * S = 0

(i.e.  It’s possible to be a dead molecule in a universe,  but that universe would not exist because we cannot realize it)

fill ?3:

?3 theoretically is 1 or 0, however

?3 * S = 0 , because 1 is equivalent to Null

since we wonder,  therefore ?3 * S = 0  despite  ?3 = 1

(i.e.  It’s possible to be an non-intellect alive being  in a universe,  but that universe would not exist because we cannot wonder about it)

Again ,  the below table reads as:  Is it possible to  (wonder/ not wonder) existence in (an existence/ no existence) ?

                                          (ka)                                            (kb)
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wonder existence xxxxxxx Not wonder existence

Null: no existence             0                     xxxx                    1

I: existence                       1                        xxxx                  ?4

fill ?4 :

?4 theoretically is 1 or 0, however

?4 * S = 0 , because 1 is equivalent to either  (jb-I)   or  (ja-I)

as said before, (jb-I) is ?2  since we exist (jb-I) * S = 0

& as said before, (ja-I) is ?3  since we wonder (ja-I) * S = 0

since we exist and wonder,  therefore ?4 * S = 0

(i.e. It’s possible to not wonder in a fascinating universe, but that universe would not exist because to us it would not be there)

 

Finally, the below table reads as:  Is it possible to have (no purpose/a purpose) in (an existence/ no existence) ?

                                       A                                         B
xxxxxxxxxxxx no purpose     xxxxx       a  purpose

 

Null: no existence             1          xxxx             0

 

I: existence                     ?                xxxx             1

 

fill in the ? :

 

? * S    (i.e.  existing without purpose, from our point of view)   :

? is theoretically 1 or 0,

? * S is 1   under (jb)  & (kb)

? * S is likely 1   if and only if  under (ja)  & (kb)

? * S is 0   under (jb)   , because as said before

since we exist  (jb-I) * S,  which is ?2 = 0

? * S is 0   under (kb)   , because as said before

since we exist and wonder  (kb-I) * S,  which is ?4  = 0

? * S  is 0  under  (ja)   ,  because as said before

since we wonder (ja-I)  * S,  which is ?3  = 0

Thus ? * S is 0 under (ka),  because  both (kb) & (ja) = 0

Therefore ? * S = 0

(i.e. It’s possible to not have a purpose in an existence that you don’t wonder. It will then just be an existence that you exist in but does not exist because it does not exist to our wondering point of view. )

Furthermore, the below table reads as:  Is it possible to have a (non-moral purpose/ morality purpose) in (an existence/ no existence) ?

                                                B                                        B+
xxxxxxxxxx Non-moral purpose    xxxxx Morality purpose

Null: no existence             0                 xxxx             0

I: existence                     ?+                  xxxx             1

fill ?+ :

?+ theoretically is 1 or 0 , however

if a single soul results in ?+ = 0, then ?+* S = 0   for all

Therefore ?+ * S = 0

(i.e.  no other wonder of consciousness would accept an unjust purpose that harms them.  So no such purpose  would exist to our point of view.  Justifying morality remains common for existing and survival   )

…And so existence comes to our consciousness and reason of humanity for us to justify morality and wonder about fairness to survive and be happy among each other,  giving a meaning to ourselves, and meaning to the universe itself.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s